NLRB Bans Employer Captive Audience Meetings Bolstering the Standing of State Bans

December 19, 2024 by Beeson Tayer & Bodine

By Grant Reed-Hoos

The Biden Board has issued a decision prohibiting employers from forcing employees under penalty of discipline to attend anti-union presentations prior to union elections. The decision in Amazon.com Services (November 13, 2024) overrules the 1948 Babcock & Wilcox Co. decision which held that such meetings were legal under the NLRA (except when held within 24 hours of an NLRB election).

In Babcock & Wilcox Co., the Board held that mandatory meetings held by employers in which employees were required to listen to the employer’s anti-union message were protected by the NLRA provision giving employers the right to express their views on unionization so long as they do so without threat of reprisal or interference with workers’ rights. Employers have used anti-union captive audience meetings for decades since, forcing employees to listen to union-busting propaganda or be fired.

In overturning Babcock & Wilcox Co., and banning compulsory anti-union meetings, the Board held that captive audience meetings do in fact interfere with employee labor rights. Specifically, the Board highlighted that captive audience meetings deny employees the right not to listen to the employer’s anti-union speech, give employers an opportunity to perform otherwise prohibited surveillance of workers, and allow employers to silence union supporters by excluding or evicting them from the meeting. The new decision applies only to future violations.

The decision allows employers a narrow safe harbor for meetings about unionization going forward. Employers may hold meetings about unionization without violating the NLRA so long as they provide employees with prior notice that the employer will be expressing its view of unions; that the meeting is voluntary; that employees will not be disciplined, discharged, or punished for non-attendance; and that the employer will not keep records of employee attendance.

Ten states (including California) have passed bans on employer-mandated captive audience meetings since 2010, but employers have been challenging these bans on the ground that they conflict with NLRB law. This new decision from the Board is likely to be reversed by new Board appointees during the Trump Administration, but, for now, it weakens the employer arguments that the state bans unlawfully conflict with federal law.

 

The material on this website is provided by Beeson, Tayer & Bodine for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult with their own legal counsel before acting on any of the information presented. Some of the articles are updated periodically, and are marked with the date of the last update. Again, readers should consult with their own legal counsel for the most current information and to obtain professional advice before acting on any of the information presented.